The exclusive reliance on automated monitoring tools creates a false sense of security in the management of data infrastructures. Standard metrics such as CPU utilization, disk latency, and query volume, although essential, represent only the surface layer of a system’s health. They are reactive indicators that fail to capture the subtle, predictive anomalies that precede critical performance incidents.
True operational resilience lies not in monitoring, the collection of data about known events, but in observability: the ability to interpret the complex interaction between system components to diagnose unanticipated problems. This root cause analysis, which correlates wait events, query execution plans, and low-level contention, is a function that transcends automation and requires the cognition of an expert DBA.
For medium and large companies, where database performance (whether SQL or NoSQL) directly impacts revenue and customer experience, neglecting this layer of in-depth analysis represents a significant operational risk. HTI Tecnologia operates precisely at the intersection between monitoring data and the specialized intelligence needed to ensure performance, availability, and security. This article details performance anomalies that are often invisible to automated systems, demonstrating why the intervention of experts is an indispensable component in the support of complex data environments.
This article details seven performance anomalies that automated tools often fail to detect and that require the intervention of experts to avoid severe impacts on business continuity.
The Intrinsic Limitation of Standard Monitoring Tools
Before detailing the anomalies, it is fundamental to distinguish between monitoring and observability.
- Monitoring is the act of collecting and displaying predefined data, such as CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk latency. It is a process that answers known questions (“What is the CPU utilization now?”).
- Observability is the ability to infer the internal state of a system from its external outputs (logs, metrics, traces). It allows for the exploration of the unknown and answers questions that were not anticipated (“Why are payment transactions 15% slower only for users from a specific region?”).
Standard monitoring tools operate on the first layer. They are excellent for tracking general health but generate “noise,” false-positive alerts, and lack the ability to correlate discrete events across different layers of the stack (application, database, operating system, network). A human expert, on the other hand, practices observability, using the tools as data sources for a much deeper root cause analysis.
7 Anomalies That Automated Monitoring Doesn’t Show
Below, we present real technical problems that escape the detection of automated systems but are routinely identified and solved by senior DBAs, like those on the HTI Tecnologia team.
1. Micro-Latencies and Low-Level I/O Saturation
- What the tool shows: The average disk latency is within acceptable limits (e.g., <10ms). The IOPS (I/O operations per second) appears normal.
- What the expert identifies: Monitoring tools aggregate data over time (usually in 1 to 5-minute intervals). Very short latency spikes, of just a few seconds, are “diluted” in the average and do not trigger alerts. An expert DBA, however, analyzes specific database wait events (such as io scheduler waits or log file sync) and correlates them with OS-level I/O analysis tools. They can identify that, during backups or transaction peaks, the disk queue depth increases drastically for short periods, causing a cascade of small latencies that affect the end-user experience, even if the overall average remains “green.”
2. Subtle Degradation of Execution Plans in Critical Queries
- What the tool shows: Query X, which used to execute in 50ms, now takes 80ms. The increase is gradual and remains below the alert threshold for “slow queries.”
- What the expert identifies: The database’s query optimizer can change a query’s execution plan due to stale statistics, changes in data volume, or minor schema alterations. This change might cause a query that previously used an efficient Index Scan to start performing a Full Table Scan. Automated tools do not detect this change in the database’s strategy. An experienced DBA uses tools like EXPLAIN to analyze and compare historical execution plans, identifying the exact cause of the degradation and forcing the use of an optimized plan or updating the statistics to correct the behavior.
3. Transient Lock Contention and Deadlocks
- What the tool shows: No deadlock failures are recorded in the main logs. CPU utilization is normal.
- What the expert identifies: Short-lived resource conflicts (locks) are common in transactional systems. However, when multiple sessions frequently compete for the same resource, even for milliseconds, it creates an invisible queue. Standard monitoring does not capture this transient contention. A DBA investigates specific system views (like sys.dm_os_wait_stats in SQL Server or pg_stat_activity in PostgreSQL) to identify which resources are under the most contention. They might discover that a poorly designed transaction in the application is locking a critical table for too long, causing a domino effect of slowness in other parts of the system.
4. Index and Heap Fragmentation at Non-Critical Levels
- What the tool shows: The fragmentation of the indexes is at 15%, below the alert limit, which is usually set to >30%.
- What the expert identifies: The 30% threshold is arbitrary and does not consider the type of workload. For tables with very high read frequency and a sequential access pattern, a fragmentation of just 10-15% can already cause significant performance degradation, as it forces the disk to perform more I/O operations to read data that should be contiguous. The DBA does not rely on generic thresholds; they analyze the table’s usage pattern and the criticality of the operations to define a proactive index maintenance strategy (reorganization or rebuild) tailored to the real business need.
5. Connection Leaks from Applications
- What the tool shows: The number of active connections to the database is high, close to the configured limit, but has not exceeded it.
- What the expert identifies: An application with a “connection leak” opens sessions with the database and does not close them correctly. Over time, the connection pool is exhausted, and new application requests fail or are put on hold. The monitoring tool only sees the symptom (high number of connections). The DBA analyzes the state of each connection (e.g., idle in transaction), its origin, and its activity time to identify the application or microservice that is causing the problem. This analysis is crucial for directing the development team to fix the application code, solving the root cause of the problem, not just the symptom (increasing the connection limit).
6. Suboptimal Memory Configuration and Indirect Pressure on the OS
- What the tool shows: The memory usage by the database process is high (e.g., 80-90% of the allocated memory), which is normal for a DBMS that uses memory for caching.
- What the expert identifies: The question is not how much memory is being used, but how. A DBA analyzes internal metrics like the Buffer Cache Hit Ratio and the Page Life Expectancy. A low hit ratio means the database is reading from the disk more frequently than it should, indicating that the cache area may be poorly sized. They can also identify that an inadequate configuration is causing “swapping” at the operating system level, an extremely slow operation that degrades the performance of the entire server. Optimizing these parameters is a complex task that automated tools do not perform.
7. Workload Drift
- What the tool shows: The current metrics are within the “normal” ranges.
- What the expert identifies: “Normal” changes over time. A new feature in the application or an increase in the number of users can fundamentally alter the query pattern (workload) on the database. Indexes that were efficient six months ago may become useless, and new optimization opportunities may arise. Monitoring tools lack the intelligence to analyze this historical evolution of the workload. An expert DBA performs periodic workload analyses, comparing them with historical baselines to identify trends, predict future bottlenecks, and recommend proactive adjustments to the data and indexing architecture.
The Role of the Expert: From Reaction to Strategic Proactivity
The identification of these anomalies demonstrates that true performance management is not in data collection, but in its contextual interpretation. An expert DBA is not just a “problem solver”; they are an architect of resilience. Their job is to ensure that the data infrastructure not only works but is optimized to support the evolution of the business in a secure and performant way.
This is where outsourcing DBA services with a partner like HTI Tecnologia becomes a strategic decision.
Why Outsource Database Management and Monitoring with HTI?
For many companies, maintaining an in-house team of senior DBAs with expertise in multiple technologies (MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, MongoDB, Redis, Neo4J) is financially and operationally unfeasible. Outsourcing offers a robust solution.
- Technical Focus and Dedicated Expertise: HTI’s team is composed of specialists who dedicate 100% of their time to the administration, optimization, and security of databases. This continuous immersion ensures a level of knowledge that a generalist IT team can hardly achieve.
- Risk Reduction and 24/7 Operational Continuity: Critical problems do not only occur during business hours. With HTI’s 24/7 support service, your company is guaranteed that an expert will be available to act immediately on any incident, minimizing downtime and business impact. This eliminates the risk associated with the absence of an internal DBA (vacations, leaves, or turnover).
- Cost Optimization and FinOps Vision: Hiring a senior DBA has a high cost (salary, benefits, training). Outsourcing converts this fixed cost into a predictable and scalable operational expense. In addition, HTI’s experts apply FinOps principles to optimize resource usage, especially in cloud environments, avoiding over-provisioning and reducing infrastructure costs.
Partnering with HTI does not replace your internal team; it strengthens it, allowing your talents to focus on the core business while experts take care of the critical data foundation.
The Strategic Decision Beyond the Tools
Server monitoring tools are essential, but they are only the starting point. They provide the “symptoms,” but the diagnosis, root cause analysis, and prescription of the correct solution require expertise, experience, and a proactive vision.
Ignoring the subtle signs that only experts can interpret is to risk the performance, security, and availability that sustain your operations. The difference between a system that “works” and a system that consistently delivers top-tier performance lies in the layer of human intelligence that analyzes the data the tools collect.
Your data infrastructure is too critical to depend solely on automated alerts.
Schedule a conversation with one of our specialists and discover the blind spots in your monitoring.
Visit our Blog
Learn more about databases
Learn about monitoring with advanced tools
Have questions about our services? Visit our FAQ
Want to see how we’ve helped other companies? Check out what our clients say in these testimonials!
Discover the History of HTI Tecnologia
See more:
- How to detect performance bottlenecks before the user complains: HTI Tecnologia’s article “Detecting Performance Bottlenecks in Databases” explores how to identify and resolve critical points that affect the performance of database environments — emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring, well-defined processes, and the support of an outsourced DBA to ensure performance, scalability, and stability.
- Why Waiting for the Problem to Appear Is the Biggest Mistake in Infrastructure Management: The HTI Tecnologia article “Erro em gestão de infraestrutura” shows how failures in IT structure and operations — such as lack of expertise, team overload, absence of monitoring, and deficient processes — can severely compromise the company’s database environment and entire IT infrastructure.
- Downtime is expensive: how much does your company lose per hour without a DBA monitoring?: The HTI Tecnologia article highlights how downtime — or unplanned outages — generates high costs for companies and emphasizes the importance of having an outsourced DBA continuously monitoring database environments to prevent critical losses and ensure availability.
